Sustainability - the crude could stop coming out of the ground tomorrow, and people - well, what people were left - would still be painting oilcloth and knitting wool socks for centuries to come. Try that with Goretex and Vibram.
Human scale - with a couple exceptions, most all of it can be fabricated oneself with a minimum of tools - even the tools to make the tools are a bare step or two away from raw trees and rocks.
Simplicity - There just isn't a toy for every little need. Some stuff is improvised on an ad hoc basis - many many others dispensed with entirely.
It really is a fascinating hobby - most important I think for how it focuses the mind on just how little is necessary to live... and how much is required for our lives as we know them.
Down in Oz, Loup is working on an interesting series of posts [one two three four] tying together the living history side of things with the whole
It really does seem to scratch some of the same itch I think - I doubt there's much coincidence that at least in America the historical hobbies seemed to blossom when we were in the midst of a decades-long ideological conflict that forced us not just to plumb our own national identity, but also face the possibility of it all burning down if the missiles started to fly.
Add to that, well - it was the first generation or two where most folks started living off the farm and getting homesick for it. (Of course, some folks had the good sense to just not leave in the first place. ;) )
All that together, I think it's no surprise that undercurrent of rootedness and self/clannish reliance runs through both cultures.
Now - all that comes with a boatload of caveats. I think in an age of FLIR and radar imagery and whatever else the Better Killing Inc** folks have come up with in the last several decades, the days of encamped Wolverines in the mountains are probably pretty much done. Add to that there's a world of difference between a nice week or three in the bush, and building a new home from the trees.
On a more practical scale though, I can't deny it's a nice cozy feeling having a full larder at home, basics that are easy to move, and standing invitations with friends in several different parts of the country.
It's nice to be useful. :p
... Which brings me back around to Loup's talks, and why the hobby itself has some neat side benefits. You do stuff.... know it in a way you just can't from a book.
Recently in conversation those same Foxfire books came up again - the idea being how useful they'd be if things soured for us in the first world.
Now, all credit due to the folks who said that- they know and have done a heck of a lot more than I ever have. I am but an egg!...
And yet, the old bardic instinct comes back...
Knowledge between pages is useless. Worse than useless, for it leads to false confidence.
It's the knowledge in your head and in your hands what makes the difference.
So keep talkin' y'all. Thanks for the lectures... there is an audience out here on the other side of the lights. ;)
Next on the project list - fiddle bag and shoes!! :)
* One of the more curious splits I've seen amongst those in this hobby is the cultural/political one across timelines of interest. It's hardly a universal, but broadly speaking it seems to me the more right- and libertarian- types tend to gravitate to the post-gun powder era, roughly F&I to just post US Civil War, and the more left of center types to the medieval period. Why that may be is a discussion for another day. :p
** So when's that book coming out, Tams?

5 comments:
Good post. Thanks for the mention.
http://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com/
Most folks learn by doing with their hands, and nothing teaches you more about how our forebears got by than doing it for yourself, handmade clothing/shoes and all.
I did that whole 1803-1847 period for ten years. You need any help, you shout, hear?
Not related to this post, but thought I'd point you to a site you might be interested in...or maybe I picked it up from your site and forgot - in which case, I beg your forgiveness for not noting my sources
Bloggin fae the 'Burn: Ulster-Scots thoughts
http://clydesburn.blogspot.com/#uds-search-results
I've been rattling this one back and forth in my head. The two books that get most of the thumbing thru before bedtime are Gabe Suarez's SKS Gunfighting and Thomas Elpel's Participating in Nature. I guess this would put me more in the "Army of One Wolverine" camp, and I certainly don't want anything to happen that would necessitate using the skills in both of those books, and I definitely like having a dry, warm bed to sleep in every night, and warm food to eat, and my dogs by my side, with plenty of chow for them. I think it's realists unease with that Chinese curse, "may you live in interesting times," and we are.
You write "Knowledge between pages is useless. Worse than useless, for it leads to false confidence."
Yes and no, in my experience.
Yes: E.g., I am a reasonably serious player of the game of Go (2 dan in the AGA ranking system) and I have seen various examples of how owning (and even superficially reading) books about how to play better is not at all the same thing as understanding the books. And it can indeed lead to false confidence. (Though in Go feedback is so quick and sharp, in the form of a clear losing record when one tries to play at the wrong handicap, that it's hard to maintain that false confidence for long.)
No: E.g., I have used recipe-style books and documentation to complete a number of projects (such as splicing DNA into a plasmid, baking chocolate eclairs, building a sonar rangefinder, building an igloo-style snow shelter, and implementing a strong pseudorandom number generator in software) which I didn't know how to do before I started them. Sometimes I have finished a project successfully and still been well aware that I didn't properly understand the recipe. I would agree that having recipe-style self-help availability is less valuable than comprehensive internalized mastery of a discipline, but sometimes the first step of mastery takes hundreds of hours of study, and using the recipe only takes 10 hours, so the recipe can have a pretty good bang for the buck.
Post a Comment